UNDER ONE HOUR
Case intake to
30-page opposition
to a motion to dismiss.
This is not a pitch. This is the actual workflow we ran on a live 12(b)(6) motion. Every step. Every output. Nothing staged.
"We treat litigation like an engineering problem. Claims have elements. Elements have answers."
Click to enlarge
Step 1: Case Grounding
Before a word is written,
the case is fully structured.
- Tell Your Story. Attorney enters the narrative, parties, and objectives.
- Upload Documents. Motion, complaint, exhibits. Any format.
- Generate Summary. The AI reads everything and builds a structured case file.
"The system knows the case before it does anything."
Click to enlarge
Step 2: Case Summary
Structured intelligence.
Not notes.
- Parties, claims, and key facts extracted and organized from the record
- Allegations mapped against the motion's arguments automatically
- This summary is the foundation. Everything downstream inherits from it.
"Nothing is invented. Every output traces back to the record."
Click to enlarge
Step 3: Strategy
The agent decomposes
every issue.
- Each argument in the motion is broken into its legal elements
- Offensive and defensive positions mapped across every claim
- Constrained to the case file. The agent cannot pull from training memory.
"Claims have elements. Elements have answers. We build toward them."
Click to enlarge
Step 4: Gap Analysis
Every weakness in their motion.
Identified.
- Gaps between their arguments and the record surface automatically
- Each gap traced back to a source document or absence of evidence
- This becomes the attack surface the opposition is built around
"You can't argue what you can't see. We make it visible."
Click to enlarge
The Result
Outline. Draft. Court-ready.
The draft inherits everything built before it. No improvisation at the keyboard. No memory. Just the work, assembled.
Structured Outline
Click to enlarge
Court-Ready Draft
Click to enlarge
Pay only if satisfied.
